WordPress 3.0 Update Completed

Well that was unusually painful. My host did an automated upgrade to WordPress 3.0 yesterday (I have it set that way so I’m always up to date). In the past this has been an almost invisible process. This time it took the whole site down.

After some exhaustive testing (basically activating one plugin at a time) I finally discovered that the culprit was my Lifestream plugin.  There was a relatively quick fix though. What I didn’t realize was that testing process messed up the settings on several other plugins.

I think I have them all working again now.

Eoghann Irving is a sci-Fi fan, self professed geek, owner of too many computers and general know it all. Follow me on Google Buzz, LinkedIn or Twitter to chat about this or anything else. View Comments

Whole Wheat Pancakes Recipe

Updated  7/04/10: I reduced the baking powder from 2 teaspoons to 1  1/2  teaspoons which significantly improved the sodium values without affecting the pancakes.  I also dropped to a 1/4 cup serving size which still produces reasonable sized pancakes but allows 12-14 servings per recipe.

I’ve started experimenting with cooking at home rather than buying in for some items. My main goals are to increase my fiber intake and decrease my sodium intake. If I can add some other nutrition as well, so much the better. So this morning I decided to try whole wheat pancakes and for a first attempt it went quite well.

Whole Wheat Pancakes Ingredients

  • 2 cups whole wheat flour
  • 1 1/2 teaspoons baking powder
  • 1/2 teaspoon of kosher salt
  • 2 eggs (well beaten)
  • 2 cups of milk (2%)
  • 2 tablespoons of applesauce

The kosher salt is used because it has only half the sodium of regular salt and the applesauce replaces oil in most recipes which reduces the fat and calorie content.

Whole Wheat Pancakes Directions

Stir together the dry ingredients, then add the eggs, milk and apple sauce. Stir until the dry ingredients are thoroughly moistened and the batter is relatively smooth. Then cook on a pre-heated griddle (or frying pan) on medium heat until the edges dry up and the top has bubbles. Flip and cook for a little longer to brown.

Makes 12 – 14 servings using a 1/4 cup measure

Estimated Nutrition for Whole Wheat Pancakes

Using the 1/4 cup measure I estimate the nutrition values as follows:

  • Calories: 101
  • Fat: 2 grams
  • Carbs: 14.5 grams
  • Fiber: 3 grams
  • Protein: 5 grams
  • Sodium: 134 mg

The big gain here is the sodium content. Packet mixes have closer to 800mg of sodium per serving. The 3g of fiber is better than regular pancake mix and about equivalent to whole wheat pancake mix. It’s probably saving 100 – 150 calories too depending on your brand of choice.

Estimated Cost

  • Whole Wheat: $0.50
  • Baking Powder: $0.09
  • Kosher Salt: $0.02
  • Eggs: $0.50
  • Milk: $0.56
  • Apple Sauce: $0.10
  • Recipe Cost: $1.77
  • Serving Cost: $0.15

By my reckoning that’s about a third the cost of packet mixes. Not bad.

Difficulty

2 out of 10 maybe? Beating eggs is as complicated as it gets. It barely takes any longer than using a packet mix.

Reaction

I ate one of the pancakes myself and was pleasantly surprised for a first attempt. They were a little heavier than I was used to and of course had that stronger whole wheat taste, but with a bit of butter and marmalade very nice indeed.

Perhaps more importantly I feed them to my two sons and the both loved them!

Recipe Tweaks

I may try decreasing the amount of apple sauce to see if that makes it lighter. I’m also wondering if I could decrease the salt further to improve that sodium value. Even with the whole wheat this is still pretty light on fiber so the logical thing would be to add something else to the mix to boost that further. Suggestions?

Eoghann Irving is a sci-Fi fan, self professed geek, owner of too many computers and general know it all. Follow me on Google Buzz, LinkedIn or Twitter to chat about this or anything else. View Comments

Do Android and the iPhone Herald the Return of Micro-computing?

Screenshot of Atari BASIC, an early BASIC lang...
Image via Wikipedia

Once upon a time, when the earth was young, strange people who had an interest in computers were engaged in the hobby of micro-computing. Technically the modern PC is a micro-computer, but it’s not a term that’s commonly used any more.

Apart from obscure terminology, there is a fundamental difference between what the hobbyists in the 80s were doing and how most of us use computers now.  Most micro-computer enthusiasts programmed. These days BASIC is considered a simplistic language, but for amateur programmers trying to harness the limited power of 80′s micros, it was perfect.

One of the differences of course was that all computers came with a language for free which made it easy to experiment.  But I think the most significant one was scale. Early microcomputers had memories of 48Kb or 64Kb.  That limitation meant that programs had to be compact and only one programmer was needed to write them. Graphics and sounds were equally restricted. Hardware limitations created an environment where the hobbyist programmer was able to produce software in their home that was as good or better than the “professional” software houses.

Of course those days are long passed. Now you need a movie sized budget to create hit software. Perhaps that results in better, more sophisticated programs, but for tinkerers like me the barriers put between modern computers and their users are frustrating and disappointing.

Enter The Smart Phone

Which brings us to today and the rise of the smart phone. These devices already have memory and graphics that put my ZX Spectrum and Amiga 1200 to shame. But the hardware restrictions are tight enough to allow a solo programmer to compete. And best of all the development environments are readily available. Suddenly people can tinker and experiment again at no cost.

The app stores are packed with specialized programs maintained by an enthusiastic hobbyist and offered at little or no cost.  This is what the shareware and public domain scenes used to look like before businesses took over.

I’m not idealistic enough to think this state of affairs can last. But I’m getting a real old-school vibe from the smart phone scene at the moment and I’m loving it.

Eoghann Irving is a sci-Fi fan, self professed geek, owner of too many computers and general know it all. Follow me on Google Buzz, LinkedIn or Twitter to chat about this or anything else. View Comments

Stargate: Universe, Success or Failure?

I have been… critical of Stargate: Universe during it’s first season. At one point I compared it to Star Trek: Voyager (and in my world that’s no compliment). Now that the season is complete, it makes sense to look back and see whether Universe lived up to the early promise of the show.
I’m a little surprised to find that I think it actually has lived up to at least some of that promise.  I don’t retract any of my criticism, but I think looking at the season as a whole there is a flow that is missing from most shows. Little details in one episode become significant several weeks later.  That sort of attention to continuity is nice to see.

It took a long time, but we do now have a cast with some depth and distinctiveness. No longer is Robert Carlyle’s Doctor Nicholas Rush holding the show together single handedly. Admittedly our romantic leads remain largely bland but everyone else seems to have a personality.

There’s still an annoying tendency to ape Battlestar Galactica in style, but the show is no longer completely in BSG’s shadow.

All of which is good, but it’s hardly a ringing endorsement. And some problems remain. We’ve seen only one alien race so far, and that very briefly. They rely far too heavily on the communication stones and I thought it was far too early in the series to prop it up with so many SG-1 cameos. Clearly the writers over-played their hand with the crew tension early on as well. And at some fundamental level this is not Stargate. If it wasn’t obvious to you before, the scenes with Richard Dean Anderson made it very clear that SGU does not fit comfortably in the Stargate franchise.

But in many ways those final two episodes redeemed the show. Certainly it was the first time that I’ve actually been disappointed that the episode was over and the season cliffhanger actually had me eager to see exactly how they resolve it (don’t blow this Stargate!) That was all it took. two hours of tense, drama capitalizing on all that’s come before and putting characters in situations where we actually care what happens.

So was Stargate: Universe a success? Not entirely. But it wasn’t a failure either. I’m going to be back for the next season.

Eoghann Irving is a sci-Fi fan, self professed geek, owner of too many computers and general know it all. Follow me on Google Buzz, LinkedIn or Twitter to chat about this or anything else. View Comments