Is Siri The Future?

<br />There was a lot of fuss about Siri when it came out. Then, like most things, the press moved on. Now you mainly hear people talking about when Siri doesn't work.

So.. is Siri, or to be more specific voice control, the future or not? Well this info­graphic suggests that everyone wants it.

Even though a lot of you aren't very happy with it when you get it.

Person­ally I think it's too limited and cumber­some to ever become the primary control method for a phone.

Embedded Link

proxy?container=focus&gadget=a&resize h=100& content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F05%2Fsiri why dont you understand me Is Siri The Future?

Siri, Why Don't You Under­stand Me? [info­graphic]
Siri is much more user friendly than my phone's voice control.

Google+: Reshared 1 times
Google+: View post on Google+

Overly opinionated owner and author of You can get updated on his posts directly on the blog here or through the usual social networking suspects. What? You expected me to say something interesting here? That's what the blog posts are for.

14 thoughts on “Is Siri The Future?”

  1. You interact with your envi­ron­ment primarily tactilely. You interact with people primarily vocally. So, until I start to think of my phone/artificial data assis­tant as a person, I will prefer to interact with it tactilely.

  2. Siri is not easily discov­er­able for all the tasks you can use it for and is much easier to use when you tailor your usage to the way Siri works and its limi­ta­tions. Unfor­tu­nately, Apple is adver­tising it as the inter­face you don't have to know to use. Also, since there has been no update to Siri in the last 6 months accen­tu­ates its flaws and limtations.

  3. I don't have Siri, but I never use the Android voice commands either.

    Partly it seems to struggle a bit with my accent (a common complaint I've seen) but mainly because it's not conve­nient while outside or sitting in a cube. So when would I really do it?

  4. I do think voice control is impor­tant. I use what I can on my Android but I was disap­pointed that ICS didn't have a competitor for Siri. Google has more hooks into data than anyone. They would have to do more than Siri functionality-wise. They can beat Apple, they just need to do it.

  5. +Bedhan Ball I would still have to speak. My issue with voice commands have nothing to do with the fact that I either need to hold the phone or use a hands­free. But sliding the phone out of my pocket and swipe across the screen a few times draws a lot less distrac­tion than any form of sound. What would be bene­fi­cial would be to not have to pull the phone out and use discreet gestures to interact with an inter­face I can see anyway (the +Project Glass method) or let me just look at the screen and interact as I focus on what I want.

  6. +Johan Thorstensson when you do need to use it hands free then a voice inter­face is the best way to interact. +Project Glass would add to the level of distrac­tion that people have using smart devices walking or driving so it would have its own draw­backs. I've seen people walking into cars as they are texting and looking at their screen not the road.

  7. +Bedhan Ball We seem to have different needs. I almost always have at least one hand free, but I'm often around a lot of people who will at best give me weird looks if I give coice commands (as in on the train or bus) or be annoyed at the disrup­tion (as in cafés or at work). Hence I care very much about how much my inter­ac­tion with my phone affects someone else, and only on extremely rare occa­sions would I need a truly hands­free experience.

    If your needs differ then Siri and her friends must be good news for you. Also I do appre­ciate what voice commands can do for the visu­ally impaired. It's just not for me.

Tell Me What You Think...